Or you could go ahead and leave the system drive in place just to lull the attacker into a false sense of success but you never boot or mount that drive. This offers some mitigation to the Evil Maid Attack and the whole related class of vulnerabilities: laptops with no built-in storage whatsoever. An NGFF M.2 drive in a USB3 enclosure is nicely compact and pocketable, too. Nice thing about USB3.x is that when used in combination with a systems-grade SSD as opposed to a commodity blister-pack thumb drive, you now have a removable drive with the performance and endurance to be your only drive for any reasonable ordinary workload. Like I said earlier, I would love to buy this, but the price is a major sticking point. I have a laptop I bought in 2003 from Sams Club for $300 at this time of year still plugging away with the kids using it. I agree about them lasting a long time, I have a laptop that I bought in 2007 still plugging away and it does what I need, and I didn't purchase it for $1,800 either. I would love to purchase this, but I cannot justify the price tag to the wife or kids because I already went through this fight on a macbook air for one of the kids. You mentioned the biggest drawback in the last line, the price. But the lessons learned here will be readily extensible to the finances available to a dissident blogger in once it's been shaken down by people with the institutional or community backing (or at least the spare change in their pocket) to do so.
#Qubes os for macbook air professional
Until then some of the tab is going to have be paid by people with a professional need for security, a large class of whom can afford it: journalists, government workers, diplomats, technologists and industrialists who travel globally. How many people also have roughly $1,800 to throw away on a laptop as well.Īs a bleeding-edge conceptual work in progress it's not Shenzhen-friendly for manufacturing purposes, so you're not going to get Best Buy prices until the platform stabilizes on something that's going to work long term for a broad marketplace. Its all about the value to you, not the cost - if you don't see the value in spending a thousand pounds on a laptop, fine - I do.Īnd this one actually looks like a nice piece of kit to use, especially with HW control of the comms. So yes, people do spend that kind of money. Sometimes spending more upfront = spending less in the long term. I spent a similar amount in 2006, and that one is still doing active duty as the family computer although I am looking around for its replacement now. Thats at least 5 years worth of laptop, probably more. I don't intend on replacing it for another 2 years at least given the trend in modern OS's for reducing resource requirements.
![qubes os for macbook air qubes os for macbook air](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/eNnnc8rQHbs/maxresdefault.jpg)
#Qubes os for macbook air upgrade
I spent £2000ish on my 15" non retina MBP in 2012 (the last one you can upgrade yourself with aftermarket parts). Get the price down to around $400-$500 like most other laptops, than maybe people will start considering them. Many people use laptops because they are cheap. How many people also have roughly $1,800 to throw away on a laptop as well. If a typical user had to choose what he or she would rather have in his/her notebook: a better camera or a more secure piece of hardware, what do you think the answer will be? A sad one. Too bad 75% of computer users don't give a shit about security. Gives a false feeling though so there is that. Sure it's convenient but it doesn't even reach to s in security. Basically, we need the one OS experience, even if behind the scenes it's all virtual machines and trickery to make it seem like a regular environment.Ĭertain amount of inconvenience is necessary for security or you end up with things like HTTPS or using mobiles as "secure" device. Unfortunately convenience is all too likely to win over security, which is why we need security solutions that are as invisible as possible to the end user. then the potential for extra security is likely to lose out to sacrifices made in the name of convenience i.e- users will just end up doing most work in a single VM, meaning that they're still pretty vulnerable to data loss or spyware if one of the applications in that VM is compromised.
![qubes os for macbook air qubes os for macbook air](https://micahflee.com/2014/04/the-operating-system-that-can-protect-you-even-if-you-get-hacked/qubes.png)
I dunno I like the idea, but if it's just like using virtual machines in the same vein as VMWare Fusion, Parallels, VirtualBox etc. It's an interesting idea, but it seems like it would make more sense if it could be done at the application level with a regular OS i.e- all applications would run in a VM of the same basic system (to cut down on memory requirements), essentially using a virtual machine as a (hopefully) perfect form of sandboxing, with some kind of controlled mechanism for shared file-system access and messaging (so you can open up sharing between apps where appropriate).